Jun 132012
 

Irvine: Airport Condos Overview

Median home price is $377,000. Based on a rental parity value of $476,000, this market is under valued.

Monthly payment affordability has been worsening over the last 1 month(s). Momentum suggests unchanging affordability.

Resale prices on a $/SF basis increased from $342/SF to $357/SF.

Resale prices have been weak for 1 month(s). Price momentum suggests weak prices over the next three months.

Median rental rates declined $33 last month from $2,008 to $1,975.

Rents have been rising for 12 month(s). Price momentum suggests rising rents over the next three months.

Market rating = 9

Proprietary Irvine Housing News home purchase analysis

3141 MICHELSON Dr #405 Irvine, CA 92612

$419,900 …….. Asking Price
$630,000 ………. Purchase Price
4/12/2007 ………. Purchase Date

($210,100) ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($50,400) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
($260,500) ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
-33.3% ………. Gross Percent Change
-41.3% ………. Net Percent Change
-7.7% ………… Annual Appreciation

Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$419,900 …….. Asking Price
$14,697 ………… 3.5% Down FHA Financing
3.68% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$405,204 …….. Mortgage
$138,483 ………. Income Requirement

$1,861 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$364 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$105 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$422 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$826 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$3,577 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

($402) ………. Tax Savings
($618) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$18 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$72 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$2,648 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$5,699 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$5,699 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$4,052 ………… Interest Points
$14,697 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$30,147 ………. Total Cash Costs
$40,500 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$70,647 ………. Total Savings Needed
——————————————————————————————————————————————-

This property is available for sale on the MLS.

Click on image to email us for more information.

We're sorry, but it seems that we're having some problems loading MLS # P819487 from our database. Please check back soon.

3141 MICHELSON Dr #1005, Irvine, CA $525,000
3141 MICHELSON Dr #1005
0 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,293 Sq. Ft.
3141 MICHELSON Dr #801, Irvine, CA $598,800
3141 MICHELSON Dr #801
0 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,293 Sq. Ft.
3131 Michelson Dr Unit 1108, Irvine, CA $650,000
3131 Michelson Dr Unit 1108
0.09 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,293 Sq. Ft.
21416 GRAMERCY, Irvine, CA $459,000
21416 GRAMERCY
0.26 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,285 Sq. Ft.
1118 South SCHOLARSHIP, Irvine, CA $489,500
1118 South SCHOLARSHIP
0.58 miles
3 bd / 2 ba
1,360 Sq. Ft.
3421 WATERMARKE, Irvine, CA $419,000
3421 WATERMARKE
0.61 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,250 Sq. Ft.
3260 WATERMARKE Pl, Irvine, CA $488,888
3260 WATERMARKE Pl
0.61 miles
3 bd / 2 ba
1,438 Sq. Ft.
2305 WATERMARKE Pl, Irvine, CA $430,000
2305 WATERMARKE Pl
0.65 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,123 Sq. Ft.
3222 WATERMARKE Pl, Irvine, CA $445,000
3222 WATERMARKE Pl
0.72 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,250 Sq. Ft.
3132 WATERMARKE Pl, Irvine, CA $395,000
3132 WATERMARKE Pl
0.72 miles
2 bd / 2 ba
1,123 Sq. Ft.


Sign up for the OC Housing News monthly market newsletter.

*
*
*

See the enormous foreclosure pipeline for yourself below. Enter location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."

We provide detailed information on any property.

  One Response to “Airport condos are rallying strong”

  1. At least someone in Washington recognizes the truth and isn’t afraid to say it.

    Deputy Director of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Blames Bankers for Housing Bubble

    Sparking indignation in the mortgage broker community, Raj Date, deputy director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau laid the bulk of the blame for the housing crisis on brokers during a speaking engagement Monday. His statements have led at least one industry trade group to call for his resignation.

    “After all, if you think back to the most problematic vintages of mortgages during the bubble… most of those problematic mortgages were originated not by supervised banks, but by mortgage brokers and finance companies,” Date said before a group of banking professionals at an American Bankers Association conference Monday.

    Marc Savitt, president of the National Association of Independent Housing Professionals called Date’s comments “outrageous.”

    Date, who comes from a banking background, came to his position at the CFPB “with a preconceived notion about mortgage brokers,” Savitt told MReport Tuesday.

    And it is this “preconceived notion” that Savitt says “shows me that that’s the wrong guy for the job” and has prompted the NAIHP to call for Date’s resignation. (The NAIHP is currently preparing a press release to announce their decision to call for Date’s resignation.)

    Not only has Date “energized and infuriated an entire industry,” according to Savitt, but also Date’s claims are simply “not true,” according to the trade group president.

    Date says incentives are misaligned and that leading to the mortgage bubble, “If a borrower could qualify for a loan at, say, 6 percent, a broker might juice that rate from 6 percent up to 8 percent.”

    The CFPB has been considering mandating a change in loan officer compensation changing it from a percentage model to a flat fee. Savitt believes this “is a done deal” already, and it will just be a matter of time before the CFPB implements the change.

    However, Savitt insists, citing independent studies from Harvard and Georgetown University that brokers have traditionally helped borrowers receive lower interest rates.

    Either way, Savitt says, “The banks approved these loans, not the brokers.”

    While Date speaks of “transparency, fairness, and proper financial incentives,” Savitt believes his bias makes him unfit for his role.