Aug 132012
 

In what can only be described as the best decision of the housing bust a from regulator, Federal Housing Finance Agency’s head Edward DeMarco said there will be no principal reduction on Fannie and Freddie loans. He will be loudly criticized, particularly from left-wing panderers, but Mr. DeMarco understands that Moral hazard is the central issue in housing bust, and giving away free money to loan owners is never a good idea. Millions of loanowners will be crushed by this news. Everyone who doesn’t want to see their tax dollars squandered to bail them out will rejoice.

Regulator says no to Obama mortgage write-down plan

By Rachelle Younglai — WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:41pm EDT

(Reuters) – The top housing regulator rebuffed a plan by the Obama administration to cut mortgages held by struggling homeowners, a blow to the White House which is keen to show voters it can help fix the housing market.

I don’t see how this is a big blow to the Obama Administration. It isn’t like Romney was out saying principal reduction is a good idea. This may anger some on the extreme left, but those people were going to vote for Obama anyway. I rather doubt swing voters in the middle are going to vote for Romney because they believe he will endorse forgiving the principal balance on their mortgages.

The regulator for government-run housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said on Tuesday that using taxpayer-funded bank bailout money could encourage defaults and not make a big improvement in reducing foreclosures in a cost-effective way for taxpayers.

The anticipated benefits do not outweigh the costs and risks,” said the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s head Edward DeMarco, who has come under intense pressure from the government to agree to the plan.

He is absolutely correct. It’s more cost effective to take a big loss on 10% of the portfolio rather than a somewhat smaller loss on 100% of it.

The regulator’s decision drew an immediate rebuke from the Obama administration and Democratic lawmakers. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner disputed the agency’s conclusions and urged DeMarco to reconsider his decision.

Although the housing market has shown signs of recovery, about 11 million homeowners owe more than their properties are worth and the Obama administration has struggled with various taxpayer-funded programs to keep people in their homes.

“I do not believe it is the best decision for the country,” Geithner told DeMarco in a letter released to the media.

Geithner has been a consistent opponent of principal reduction. Only since the political pressure has heated up from left-wing Pandercrats has he given lip service to the idea.

The use of targeted principal reduction would “provide much needed help to a significant number of troubled homeowners, help repair the nation’s housing market and result in a net benefit to taxpayers,” he said.

ANALYSIS

Geithner pointed out that DeMarco’s own data showed that the program would help nearly half a million homeowners and save taxpayers as much as $1 billion.

The housing regulator responded saying that figure only applied to a group of homeowners that had not made a mortgage payment in a year and would assume all those borrowers would win a mortgage writedown — a scenario deemed unlikely.

Rather, DeMarco’s analysis showed that the projected net benefit to taxpayers would be $500 million in the best case scenario and its experience has shown that the likelihood of successfully modifying mortgages was small.

The scholarly paper at the center of this controversy was put out by people with an agenda. DeMarco’s analysis is much closer to reality. The squatters who are deeply underwater are committed to squatting until foreclosure pushes them out. If you reduced their principal a little, it’s not likely they would suddenly start dutifully making their payments.

The administration has pressed DeMarco to allow Fannie and Freddie to do more principal writedowns. But DeMarco has maintained that this would needlessly drive up the costs of their taxpayer bailout.

He is right. It would.


Wouldn't you be embarrassed to overpay by $100,000? Only fools buy houses without knowing neighborhood values. Don't be a fool. Don't suffer the pain of an underwater mortgage. The surest way to lose your house is to overpay for it. Our reports identify overvalued and undervalued neighborhoods. Use it to broaden or narrow your search area. Savvy buyers work with us to find bargains. We've saved thousands from financial ruin. Let us save you too. If you want peace of mind while shopping for your next home, sign up for our monthly market newsletter.
*
*
*

We're sorry, but it seems that we're having some problems loading MLS # S707217 from our database. Please check back soon.


Proprietary Irvine Housing News home purchase analysis

3512 BIRCH St Irvine, CA 92606

$649,000 …….. Asking Price
$305,000 ………. Purchase Price
2/6/1998 ………. Purchase Date

$344,000 ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($24,400) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
$319,600 ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
112.8% ………. Gross Percent Change
104.8% ………. Net Percent Change
5.2% ………… Annual Appreciation

Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$649,000 …….. Asking Price
$129,800 ………… 20% Down Conventional
3.56% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$519,200 …….. Mortgage
$120,758 ………. Income Requirement

$2,349 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$562 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$162 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$0 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$46 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$3,120 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

($368) ………. Tax Savings
($809) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$149 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$101 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$2,193 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$7,990 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$7,990 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$5,192 ………… Interest Points
$129,800 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$150,972 ………. Total Cash Costs
$33,600 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$184,572 ………. Total Savings Needed


The property above is available for sale on the MLS.

Contact us for a comparative market analysis, a cost of ownership analysis, or information on how you can make an offer today!
*
*
*

Cost of Ownership Analysis

Are you ready to make an offer, but you are worried the cost of ownership is really more than you can afford? Don't make a mistake that might cost you the family home, your life savings, and your good credit! Get the advice of a seasoned professional. Contact us at info@ochousingnews.com today! We produce detailed reports showing the cost of ownership based on the most likely transaction price and current financing terms. You will know how much you will spend each month in out-of-pocket expenditures and the true monthly cost of ownership factoring in tax deductions, loan amortization, and opportunity costs on your down payment. In addition, we show you how this cost compares to a rental of equal quality to make sure buying is the right decision for your situation. An OC Housing News Cost of Ownership Analysis will calm your worries and give you peace-of-mind. Let us show you the way!
Address *
*
*
*
Reports are available for properties in the Southern California MLS coverage area, and are generally delivered within 24-72 hours. If you wish to receive multiple properties, please contact us at info@ochousingnews.com, and we will prepare the reports for you.

OC Housing News FREE Guides!


 

Nearby Foreclosures

Gain a competitive advantage over other buyers. By locating distressed properties -- before they hit the MLS -- you can discover where tomorrow's REOs and short sales will appear. Most of these properties are not listed on the MLS, but they will be soon. Research properties in advance and get a jump on your competition. Don't miss out on another deal because you couldn't act quickly. Use this tool to your advantage! The red properties are already bank owned. As soon as REO asset managers prepare them for sale, they will be on the MLS. Get ready! The green and blue properties have owners who are not paying their mortgages. They may be offered as short sales, or they may go through foreclosure and become REO. Either way, they will also likely be available on the MLS soon. Find your next home! Be prepared to offer on these properties by researching them in advance or risk losing out to buyers who are have done their homework. Start your research today! To find distressed properties, enter your desired location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."

Comparative Market Analysis

Are you ready to make an offer, but you are worried you will either (1) underbid and miss the property or (2) overbid and pay too much? Don't make a mistake and miss your dream home, or worse yet, overpay for it! Get the advice of a seasoned professional. Contact us at info@ochousingnews.com today! Are you thinking about selling, but you are worried you will either (1) overprice and fail to sell or (2) underprice and leave money at the negotiating table? We are the experts in real estate valuation. Work with us to set the right prices to sell your property quickly for the largest amount possible. Let us show you what your property is worth today! An OC Housing News Comparative Market Analysis will calm your worries and give you peace-of-mind. See for yourself right now!
Address *
*
*
*
Reports are available for properties in the Southern California MLS coverage area, and are generally delivered within 24-72 hours. If you wish to receive multiple properties, please contact us at info@ochousingnews.com, and we will prepare the reports for you.

10 RHODE Is, Irvine, CA $899,900
10 RHODE Is
0.42 miles
5 bd / 2.5 ba
2,872 Sq. Ft.
3972 BANYAN St, Irvine, CA $624,500
3972 BANYAN St
0.49 miles
4 bd / 2.75 ba
2,210 Sq. Ft.
1305 SUN DIAL Dr, Tustin, CA $705,000
1305 SUN DIAL Dr
0.63 miles
4 bd / 3.5 ba
2,326 Sq. Ft.
14221 WYETH Ave, Irvine, CA $628,000
14221 WYETH Ave
0.63 miles
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,268 Sq. Ft.
27 NEW JERSEY, Irvine, CA $765,000
27 NEW JERSEY
0.67 miles
5 bd / 3 ba
2,200 Sq. Ft.
25 NEW JERSEY, Irvine, CA $694,900
25 NEW JERSEY
0.67 miles
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,100 Sq. Ft.
21 GEORGIA, Irvine, CA $699,000
21 GEORGIA
0.67 miles
5 bd / 3 ba
2,280 Sq. Ft.
4252 MARGARITA St, Irvine, CA $739,900
4252 MARGARITA St
0.74 miles
4 bd / 2.25 ba
2,610 Sq. Ft.
34 SANTA COMBA, Irvine, CA $868,800
34 SANTA COMBA
0.93 miles
4 bd / 2.5 ba
2,300 Sq. Ft.
7 PIERCE, Irvine, CA $759,900
7 PIERCE
0.96 miles
4 bd / 3 ba
2,132 Sq. Ft.

  One Response to “Fannie and Freddie will not forgive principal balances”

  1. Mark this one down as wishful thinking.

    Freddie Mac: Shadow Inventory Unlikely to Bring Down Prices

    Freddie Mac isn’t afraid of shadows.

    The GSE released its U.S. Economic and Housing Market Outlook for August on Wednesday, examining recent trends in home price indices and speculating on the impact of shadow inventory on home prices.

    The Freddie Mac Home Price Index (HPI) for the country showed a 4.8 percent gain in the second quarter, the largest quarterly pickup in eight years. Year-over-year, the national index posted a 1 percent increase, the largest annual appreciation since November 2006.

    Other HPI metrics also suggest a strengthening market, with CoreLogic’s index rising 2.5 percent year-over-year for June and FHFA’s HPI posting year-over-year gains through May.

    In addition, the recovery was broad-based. From June 2011 to June 2012, 34 states (and the District of Columbia) posted gains in home prices. This was the largest number of states reporting annual appreciation since April 2007.

    Freddie Mac speculated that even if national HPIs dip in the usually weaker autumn and winter months, the second-quarter HPI gains will likely overshadow any expected declines.

    While prices have shown positive growth in many states through this year, concerns about shadow inventory-the stock of single-family loans that are seriously delinquent— have some experts worried about prices taking another tumble.

    Freddie Mac asserted that although delinquency rates may be higher than they were before the recession, the “shadow” over the housing market is not as long as some may think.

    “While the shadow inventory persists, there is an important difference in today’s market compared with those of recent years, and that’s the substantially reduced amount of excess vacant housing,” said Frank Nothaft, VP and chief economist for Freddie Mac.

    Vacancy data from the Census Bureau showed that vacancies in U.S. homes for rent or for sale continued to decline in the second quarter. Rental vacancy rates have fallen to 8.6 percent, the lowest rate since the second quarter of 2002. For-sale vacancy rates have dropped to 2.1 percent, the lowest since the second quarter of 2006.

    Additionally, the for-rent market now appears to be in relative balance, with rental stock close to overall rental demand. This results in normal vacancy levels.

    The continuing drop in excess vacant stock is important because it means that in most markets, REO homes on the for-sale market don’t have to compete with an oversized vacant inventory.

    “The housing recovery may finally be coming out from the shadows,” Nothaft said.