Aug 242012
 

The people we elect to public office should set a higher standard for conduct than ordinary citizens. If we are to trust them to make laws governing the rest of us, we should be able to rely on them to follow the rules rather than gaming the system to their advantage. Unfortunately, that’s not the world we live in. Many California lawmakers got caught up in the mania of the housing bubble, and when their faith in ever-increasing house prices was shaken, their ethics went on sabbatical.

Real estate bubble bursts for California lawmakers too

In the boom years, several California legislators bought homes but are now having trouble keeping up with mortgages or avoiding big losses.

By Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times — August 6, 2012

SACRAMENTO — State lawmakers typically keep modest quarters near the Capitol to use when they’re in town, with help from their tax-free expense allowance of $28,000 a year.

Since state lawmakers are term limited, and since they are supposed to be residents of their home districts, buying a house is a speculative play on real estate values. They could rent a house with their tax-free expense allowance and be very comfortable.

Assemblyman Tony Mendoza bought a three-bedroom home instead, paying $463,000 for it after his 2006 election.

If you bought property, property values would go higher,” said the Democrat, whose main home is in Artesia. “So I figured as soon as I get there [Sacramento], I will buy the house.

That’s the brilliant logic this guy used when considering a $463,000 investment? And we elected this guy to public office?

But now he is one of at least 10 legislators who didn’t fare well in a real estate climate that once showed no sign of cooling. The housing market tanked, the recession lingered and legislators’ pay was cut.

Unlike some predecessors who made handsome profits on second residences in Sacramento or in their districts before the downturn, these lawmakers have found themselves unable to pay their mortgages or stuck with homes that would sell at a loss, or both.

Being termed-out in 2004 was certainly a blessing to some who cashed out at the top of the bubble.

At least five have endured foreclosures or short sales. The others have hung on; to do so, at least three have depended on people who work for them — and in Mendoza’s case, on a campaign donor as well.

It sounds shady, but I don’t have a problem with politicians going to their campaign donors for help as long as such assistance is within contribution guidelines. This is money voluntarily given. I may not think the cause is very worthy, but apparently, those people do. If this is buying favors from the politician, then I have a real problem with it.

What I do think is very wrong is renting a room to an employee who the politician gives a raise. That’s a kickback. Politicians should not be allowed to have financial dealings with anyone in their employ.

As Mendoza nears the end of his final Assembly term, he says he owes $150,000 more on his Sacramento home than it’s worth. A longtime campaign contributor, Cecy Groom, who is also his accountant, rounded up investments of $42,000 to help him keep the home on Soaring Hawk Lane.

In filings required by the state, Mendoza reported receiving $6,000 each from Groom’s daughter and Beatriz Ricartti, a Los Angeles businesswoman who subsequently donated to Mendoza’s political coffers. Covina physician Shura Moreno invested $30,000.

Moreno is under investigation by the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, and five employees of his East Los Angeles medical clinic await trial on charges of defrauding the state’s Medi-Cal system, prescription fraud and other offenses.

“I was totally shocked by that,” Mendoza said.

That looks really, really bad. Why did Moreno give the $30,000 if not for special favors?

Moreno would say only that he is not interested in taking over ownership of Mendoza’s house.

Sure, he is only interested in getting out of trouble through the lawmaker’s influence.

The lawmaker also rented a room in the house to fellow legislators and to Gabriella Villanueva, whom he hired in November 2010 as a legislative assistant for $60,000 a year. Villanueva paid him $500 a month in rent.

Villanueva said there was no tie between Mendoza’s giving her a job and her decision to rent from him,

LOL! Bullshit!

and she has since moved out, although she would not say when. She was hired just before a legislative pay cut was to take effect.

What a convenient time to hire a new employee and take her on as a boarder.


Wouldn't you be embarrassed to overpay by $100,000? Only fools buy houses without knowing neighborhood values. Don't be a fool. Don't suffer the pain of an underwater mortgage. The surest way to lose your house is to overpay for it. Our reports identify overvalued and undervalued neighborhoods. Use it to broaden or narrow your search area. Savvy buyers work with us to find bargains. We've saved thousands from financial ruin. Let us save you too. If you want peace of mind while shopping for your next home, sign up for our monthly market newsletter.
*
*
*

We're sorry, but it seems that we're having some problems loading MLS # P828489 from our database. Please check back soon.


Proprietary Irvine Housing News home purchase analysis

49 MEADOWGRASS Irvine, CA 92604

$300,000 …….. Asking Price
$565,000 ………. Purchase Price
3/31/2007 ………. Purchase Date

($265,000) ………. Gross Gain (Loss)
($45,200) ………… Commissions and Costs at 8%
============================================
($310,200) ………. Net Gain (Loss)
============================================
-46.9% ………. Gross Percent Change
-54.9% ………. Net Percent Change
-11.3% ………… Annual Appreciation

Cost of Home Ownership
——————————————————————————
$300,000 …….. Asking Price
$10,500 ………… 3.5% Down FHA Financing
3.65% …………. Mortgage Interest Rate
30 ……………… Number of Years
$289,500 …….. Mortgage
$88,177 ………. Income Requirement

$1,324 ………… Monthly Mortgage Payment
$260 ………… Property Tax at 1.04%
$0 ………… Mello Roos & Special Taxes
$75 ………… Homeowners Insurance at 0.3%
$302 ………… Private Mortgage Insurance
$317 ………… Homeowners Association Fees
============================================
$2,278 ………. Monthly Cash Outlays

($200) ………. Tax Savings
($444) ………. Equity Hidden in Payment
$13 ………….. Lost Income to Down Payment
$58 ………….. Maintenance and Replacement Reserves
============================================
$1,705 ………. Monthly Cost of Ownership

Cash Acquisition Demands
——————————————————————————
$4,500 ………… Furnishing and Move In at 1% + $1,500
$4,500 ………… Closing Costs at 1% + $1,500
$2,895 ………… Interest Points
$10,500 ………… Down Payment
============================================
$22,395 ………. Total Cash Costs
$26,100 ………. Emergency Cash Reserves
============================================
$48,495 ………. Total Savings Needed


The property above is available for sale on the MLS.

Contact us for a comparative market analysis, a cost of ownership analysis, or information on how you can make an offer today!
*
*
*

Cost of Ownership Analysis

Are you ready to make an offer, but you are worried the cost of ownership is really more than you can afford? Don't make a mistake that might cost you the family home, your life savings, and your good credit! Get the advice of a seasoned professional. Contact us at info@ochousingnews.com today! We produce detailed reports showing the cost of ownership based on the most likely transaction price and current financing terms. You will know how much you will spend each month in out-of-pocket expenditures and the true monthly cost of ownership factoring in tax deductions, loan amortization, and opportunity costs on your down payment. In addition, we show you how this cost compares to a rental of equal quality to make sure buying is the right decision for your situation. An OC Housing News Cost of Ownership Analysis will calm your worries and give you peace-of-mind. Let us show you the way!
Address *
*
*
*
Reports are available for properties in the Southern California MLS coverage area, and are generally delivered within 24-72 hours. If you wish to receive multiple properties, please contact us at info@ochousingnews.com, and we will prepare the reports for you.

OC Housing News FREE Guides!


 

Nearby Foreclosures

Gain a competitive advantage over other buyers. By locating distressed properties -- before they hit the MLS -- you can discover where tomorrow's REOs and short sales will appear. Most of these properties are not listed on the MLS, but they will be soon. Research properties in advance and get a jump on your competition. Don't miss out on another deal because you couldn't act quickly. Use this tool to your advantage! The red properties are already bank owned. As soon as REO asset managers prepare them for sale, they will be on the MLS. Get ready! The green and blue properties have owners who are not paying their mortgages. They may be offered as short sales, or they may go through foreclosure and become REO. Either way, they will also likely be available on the MLS soon. Find your next home! Be prepared to offer on these properties by researching them in advance or risk losing out to buyers who are have done their homework. Start your research today! To find distressed properties, enter your desired location and press search. Scroll through list by pressing "next."

Comparative Market Analysis

Are you ready to make an offer, but you are worried you will either (1) underbid and miss the property or (2) overbid and pay too much? Don't make a mistake and miss your dream home, or worse yet, overpay for it! Get the advice of a seasoned professional. Contact us at info@ochousingnews.com today! Are you thinking about selling, but you are worried you will either (1) overprice and fail to sell or (2) underprice and leave money at the negotiating table? We are the experts in real estate valuation. Work with us to set the right prices to sell your property quickly for the largest amount possible. Let us show you what your property is worth today! An OC Housing News Comparative Market Analysis will calm your worries and give you peace-of-mind. See for yourself right now!
Address *
*
*
*
Reports are available for properties in the Southern California MLS coverage area, and are generally delivered within 24-72 hours. If you wish to receive multiple properties, please contact us at info@ochousingnews.com, and we will prepare the reports for you.

41 MEADOWGRASS, Irvine, CA $340,000
41 MEADOWGRASS
0.02 miles
2 bd / 1.5 ba
1,109 Sq. Ft.
342 DEERFIELD Ave #52, Irvine, CA $485,000
342 DEERFIELD Ave #52
0.7 miles
3 bd / 2.5 ba
1,367 Sq. Ft.
3324 COLUMBUS GROVE Dr, Tustin, CA $345,330
3324 COLUMBUS GROVE Dr
0.78 miles
3 bd / 2 ba
1,217 Sq. Ft.
18 SPRINGWATER #66, Irvine, CA $458,000
18 SPRINGWATER #66
0.93 miles
2 bd / 1.75 ba
1,120 Sq. Ft.
29 LOOKOUT Ln, Tustin, CA $349,900
29 LOOKOUT Ln
0.98 miles
3 bd / 3 ba
1,379 Sq. Ft.
133 LIBERTY St, Tustin, CA $350,000
133 LIBERTY St
1 miles
3 bd / 3 ba
1,379 Sq. Ft.
128 SAINT JAMES, Irvine, CA $419,800
128 SAINT JAMES
1.01 miles
2 bd / 2.5 ba
1,200 Sq. Ft.
83 LIBERTY St, Tustin, CA $339,900
83 LIBERTY St
1.01 miles
3 bd / 3 ba
1,375 Sq. Ft.
193 BRIARWOOD, Irvine, CA $369,000
193 BRIARWOOD
1.24 miles
3 bd / 1.25 ba
1,135 Sq. Ft.
17 MEDICI AISLE, Irvine, CA $494,000
17 MEDICI AISLE
1.33 miles
3 bd / 2 ba
1,500 Sq. Ft.

  One Response to “California lawmakers lack ethics when their real estate deals go bad”

  1. The taxpayers lost billions on the AIG bailout, but in typical government fashion, to justify their actions, they announce they saved the world and made a profit. Complete and utter bullshit. If they truly did make a profit from this bailout, wouldn’t the former bondholders and stockholders sue?

    New York Fed Profits After Selling Remaining Securities from AIG Bailout

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announced an important milestone Thursday – the final sale of its remaining securities from the 2008 AIG bailout.

    The final sales from Maiden Lane III, one of the struggling mortgage-related portfolios the Fed usurped in 2008, brought the Fed’s total profit from AIG securities to $6.6 billion.

    “I am pleased that we were able to achieve our principal goal, which was to protect the U.S. economy from the potentially devastating effects of AIG’s failure, while demonstrating sound stewardship of taxpayer interests,’‘ said William Dudley, president of the New York Fed.

    “I am proud of and commend all of the people at the New York Fed who worked tirelessly and diligently to get us here,” Dudley stated in a press release Thursday.

    The Fed has been shedding its AIG securities since early this year with the sale of its final Maiden Lane II securities in February, followed by sales of some Maiden Lane III securities in June.

    Maiden Lane LLC and Maiden Lane III LLC also repaid loans to the Fed in June, with interest.

    The Fed profited $8.2 billion in interest and fees from loans made to AIG, in addition to its profits from the sale of Maden Lane securities.

    In all, the Fed accrued $17.7 billion in revenue from its assistance to AIG.

    The Federal Reserve and the Treasury stepped in to aid AIG, the world’s largest insurance company, in 2008 when the company was teetering on the edge of collapse.

    AIG’s collapse “posed a direct threat to millions of policyholders, state and local government agencies, 401(k) participants, banks and other financial institutions in the United States and abroad,” according to the Fed.